Most people are familiar with Hegelian Dialectic Terrorism by more familiar terms, such as "shadowdbanning"
and "community standards", language used to conceal criminal activity by FACEBOOK/META and GOOGLE LLC
as if it were a civil contract.
Both franchises of the UNITED STATES, commissioned by UNITED STATES solely under the INTERSTATE COMMERCE monopoly,
are obligated to follow the law that was lobbied for in 1996 by our founder; themed 47 U.S.C. §230.
Despite knowing fraud by CNN, MSNBC, and other agencies who have been purchased by foreign unregistered sovereign
agency using the securities system and privatized exchange bords thereof, which are not entitled to sell the Law
of the United States or suggest its overthrow or deceive the public;
Subsection (c) of that law states that you may not be penalized for things you post that you did not create and
author yourself. i.e. "memes" and other stories "Shared" are not entitled "MODIFICATION" or "EDITORIAL CHANGE" or
other alteration to imply quality or defect in your use of the Internet by any "Interactive Serviec Provider".
Removal in full, or restriction of distribution right to a simple removal, are the SOLE POWERS granted to the
company to moderate such communication.
Everything else is a lie.
As is the claim that a company "owns" the work uploaded to it wholly so it may make changes as it desires, as that
is contrary the "solicitation" that your post as created will be circulated under 47 U.S.C. §230 rule; and
its intent shall not be molested unless it violates a law - for which it must be removed (not modified) and a
lawful defense to show on contest what law was violated obligating immediate action by the hosting firm, subject
civil damages for wrongful removal or mutilation.
The legal basis that this is the "solicitation" of "use as submitted material" held to be the "understanding" of
persons, and that "reasonable and common understanding" so also made in limitations on EDITORIAL POWERS in 47
U.S.C. §230, express to prohibit any Terms of Service with any United States Citizen or Resident to have any
legal authority or enjoin them because of the rights reserved in State of Oklahoma Article XXIII section XXIII-8
Regard the following:
Contracts waiving benefits of Constitution invalid.
Any provision of a contract, express or implied, made by any
person, by which any of the benefits of this Constitution is sought
to be waived, shall be null and void.
Notice or demand, stipulation for.
Any provision of any contract or agreement, express or implied,
stipulating for notice or demand other than such as may be provided
by law, as a condition precedent to establish any claim, demand, or
liability, shall be null and void.
Pursuant to THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES, ARTICLE IV SECTION 2 CLAUSE 1:
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.
Those rights, enumerated in 1907 and ratified by the Congress of the United States, are privileges and immunities of
the Citizens in the several States. Not just the home state, nor if the party is resident in such state, but in all
of the States thus made, the charter. Having a strong Constitution, as prepared in the State of Sequoyah of 1906,
prior to its general application as directed to the terms of "The Enabling of Statehood Act of 1906" ratified by the
Congress of the United States and signed into Law as a bill duly passed; obligates the corporations of the many
States to comply with these rules and withdraw from Okalhoma Territory, Indian Territory, and other freeholds and
estates in the former borders claimed by State of Oklahoma, preceding McGirt v State of Oklahoma in 2019; a
retroactive ruling citing no legal basis to take possession of PONTOTOC COUNTY or the City of Ada therein as a
legal possession of the United States or any Member State.
Persons familiar with the "false solicitation of equal access to markets", and subsequent "discrimination based on
Hegelian Dialectic Policies and Direction" of a foreign theory of law not permitted to moderate Oklahoma Constitution
Article II section II-3 and II-22 rule, and II-6 rights, were evident and clearly made a legal framework to void all
Terms of Service suggesting otherwise.
Damn tricky - those Witherspoons and Overtons.
If a contract seeks to violate those rights, such as primogeniture demands on forfeiture of real property or
estate prior the death of a living person to grant the first-born child control or equity in that estate, the
contract becomes "void", as a function of Oklahoma Constitutional Law (Article II section II-32).
Perpetuities - Monopolies - Primogeniture - Entailments.
Perpetuities and monopolies are contrary to the genius of a free
government, and shall never be allowed, nor shall the law of
primogeniture or entailments ever be in force in this State.
For those alleging State Sovereignty shall reject such Federal rule or Federal Constitution, regard you now:
Supreme law of land.
The State of Oklahoma is an inseparable part of the Federal
Union, and the Constitution of the United States is the supreme law
of the land.
And with respect to abuse of persons for their convictions, to take their
children if they dissent from the "Ruism" central to this foreign theory of
law as if medical practice to disenfranchise the legal suffrage of the People
of the State, and laws themed common law also prior held in this affirmation
of 1907 made record:
Religious liberty - Polygamous or plural marriages.
Perfect toleration of religious sentiment shall be secured, and
no inhabitant of the State shall ever be molested in person or
property on account of his or her mode of religious worship; and no
religious test shall be required for the exercise of civil or
political rights. Polygamous or plural marriages are forever
State of Oklahoma, and the common law of the freeholds of Indian Territory
from which it was made, incorporate specific rules against such abuse to
suggest Chinese "Ruism" (lit. Academic positions themed settled questions of
populist policy made by declaration or pronouncement or deemed so by the
State or other body ens legis) - a political and medical practice falsified
as a religious tenant for immunity when threatened for its illegal claims of
suspension of private property and claims on living persons in peonage, is a
religion falsely promoted as a legal theory, and at most a foreign theory of
law repugnant to the Constitution of the United States and to the Laws of
the United States.
In application by Hegelian Dialectic Terrorism, the purpose of "Ruism" is to
overwhelm and abuse and molest persons to provoke any response upon which a
false claim of taking or suspension of civil honors may be then predicated;
and assert that claim of dissent or contest as "mental illness" before the
incompetent and lazy public as to suggest consent to further injury, taking,
and felony abuse themed incitment of felony stalking and stalking and XXIII-1A
impairment of ordinary public civil honors and right to work and hold office.
The teaching of this, and promotion of this, is illegal in the State of Oklahoma,
and its execution in the "forfeiture" written threats and child kidnapping evident
employment in concert with narcissistic and sociopath personalities recruitment to
carry out such taking, interference, and cooperation by persons employed as
labor and officers of major media firms as to suggest a monetized taking of
public INTERSTATE COMMERCE franchise rights the goal of such criminal enterprise.
47 U.S.C. §230 §§(c) was designed to bar this, by prohibiting the
MODIFICATION of content; and has failed due to inept and incompetent failure of
UNITED STATES to carry out remedial correction of its franchised agent, FACEBOOK,
and INSTAGRAM, TWITTER INC., and other well known commissioned legal bodies.
The power to ADD, REMOVE, DISTRIBUTE, or MODIFY are legally separate powers, and
the wording of section 230(c) was not accidental or made to suggest other powers
that the Oklahoma Constitution wholly bar in II-3 and II-22 or to assume refuge
in any foreign state contrary XXIII-8 and XXIII-9 rule per the Federal Cosntitution
and I-1 rule.
Y'all just misunderstand the language and clearly need an adult to read it to you.
The "unequal" or "covert reduction or impairment of market advertising purchases"
based on bias of the company offering the "solicitation" (security of act for pay)
is clear 18 U.S.C. §1341 "frauds and swindles" activity; which this firm
observed in direct abuse by FACEBOOK in 2009-2013 extortion to kidnap a child;
and in impersonation of persons in 2010-2013 in false representation of real businesses
to aid in child kidnapping themed 21 O.S. §21-1533; and such statutory limitations
void per refusal to conduct lawful enforcement and due to Oklahoma Constitution Article
II section II-6 rule, in concert with 5 U.S.C. §706 rule barring any limit to the
period or scope to make restitution or statutory limits in such false offers made to
the public and generally now well recognized as "shadowbanning" and similar fraud;
initiated by the "GAMERGATE" resposne of FreeBSD administrators for the CORE COMMITTEE,
to automatically remove and report persons for free speech found to be offensive to
the ONTARIO, CANADA based Hegelian Terrorist Cell administering that stolen operating
system commercial claims and offers.
FreeBSD is "derived code", and therefore cannot be sold or offered as it is reverse
engineered from proprietary code regardless of change in language or structure; as
a tainted product then perpetually in the public domain.
Settlement not to pursue the group upon prior violation does not grant them any
exclusive franchise or rights; nor afford any of the claims made of a proprietary
operating system or exclusive use of such derived works.
We have witnessed their use and taking of IBM Redhat Linux Inc. products to give
away for purpose of diluting the brand and value of commercial services, based in
the Nation of Italy and under the title "BLUE", in a criminal conspiracy against the
rights of persons working in the Fedora Redhat Distribution of Linux; and to aid in
kidnapping and fraud with injury to children in that cause; for which FreeBSD and
all BSD based operating systems and products are forfeit to public domain in the
formal position of RACCOON TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED; for crimes against children.
Effort to conceal these crimes by export of property to Nation of Canada from the
initial point of theft in Berkely University of California; and fraud to "fork"
such works, further require that the firm dismiss all legal claims of all State of
California license and patent assertions while such child is themed missing and
exploited without due process from 2001-2022; and to deny any claims upon a plan
to extort and blackmail the Oklahoma develoeprs of certain technology using the
taking, concealment, and withholding of their children under color of law and by
abuse of such State of California franchises as FACEBOOK INC. and TWITCH INTERACTIVE
INC. to harass, menace, threaten, follow, contact, communicate threats, and sustain
a 2017-2022 ongoing denial of service attack upon the Oklahoma networks of Raccoon
Technologies Incorporated in overt Interstate Interference in Commerce, obligated
Oklahoma 22 O.S. 22-31 "Right of Self Defense" to quash this fraud.
Any claims of civil contract or orders contrary the prior rights, or to predicate a
lien or forfeiture upon persons or their labor or to overthrow the ordinary public
confidence in inheritance of real estate and real or intangible property so defined
in The Oklahoma Computer Crimes Act (21 O.S. 21-1952) prohibit any claim by State of
California, State of Texas, State of Michigan, or Nation of Canada from standing before
the offices and administration of any organization so injured by those frauds and overt
acts to damage IBM interest in Redhat Labs Inc., BeOS Inc., MSE, or other operating
system products affected by this fraud; and to terminate any claims of rights by all
parties with nexus in those jurisdictions as beneficiaries and beneficial owners of
any false claims or license arising from this fraud against victims of overt Genocide.
Use of FACEBOOK INC., TWITTER INC., and organized fraud in false claims not afforded
a genuine contest or CROSS EXAMINATION in taking for control of children, will likewise
have no standing before SEVEN ALPHA networks services or any administration of this firm
and shall not be granted case or rights in that system or dispute resolution while the
concealment of a child and ongoing false demands on kidnapping to blackmail a United
States Corporation expressed in October 2010 against RACCOON TECHNOLOGIES INCORPROATED
and again in November 2021 against RACCOON TECHNOLOGIES INCORORATED and DEEP LAYER INC.
are sustained by any concealment of any information pledged or obligated by ORDER or law
at any time to the parents of the missing child, who has been refused unlawfully then
all contact and communication with his family by the agents of the prior parties over
2001-2022 to carry this fraud.
The failure of UNITED STATES to perform its duty does not impair our rights to exercise
the same protections, privileges, and authority so made in Oklahoma Statutory Law,
Title 76 Section 76-9; or
any surrender of our duty or obligation under Oklahoma Statutes Title 22.
Federal exercise of discretion or abandonment of the office of the public trust to
serve financial interests of parties not afforded its action and so expressly barred
by Oklahoma Constitution Article II section II-6, obligate RACCOON TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED
to act accordingly and sever any benefit or payment to such persons, obtained by fraud,
or not afforded REGISTRY HEARING and compliance with affirmative defense specified in
a legal contest by Interstate Agreement then not met by the instrument produced in this
cause, a fraud on violent taking of a newborn as hostage and to extort an existing 1998
established State of Oklahoma business, duly commissioned and entitled our protection
as our client or vendor from such fraud per 21 O.S. §21-837 and §21-838.
§21-837. Intimidating laborers.
Every person who, by use of force, threats or intimidation,
prevents or endeavors to prevent any hired foreman, journeyman,
apprentice, workman, laborer, servant or other person employed by
another, from continuing or performing his work, or from accepting
any new work or employment, or induces such hired person to
relinquish his work or employment, or to return any work he has in
hand, before it is finished, is guilty of a misdemeanor.
Every person who, by use of force, threats, or intimidation,
prevents or endeavors to prevent any farmer or rancher from
harvesting, handling, transporting or marketing any agricultural
products, is guilty of a misdemeanor.
R.L.1910, § 2396; Laws 1968, c. 213, § 1, emerg. eff. April 23, 1968.
§21-838. Intimidating employers.
Every person who, by use of force, threats or intimidation,
prevents or endeavors to prevent another from employing any person,
or to compel another to employ any person, or to force or induce
another to alter his mode of carrying on business, or to limit or
increase the number of his hired foremen, journeymen, apprentices,
workmen, laborers, servants or other persons employed by him, or
their rate of wages or time of service, is guilty of a misdemeanor.
R.L. 1910, § 2397
While State of California has wrongly begun to issue immunity to
persons for misdemeanors, Raccoon Technologies Incorporated in State of Oklahoma
has no such duty or intent to excuse its citation of threats against persons in
Oklahoma which are clear violations of the prior law; and to carry out in
accordance with such laws the duty to execute Title 22 O.S. protections
and information against such fraud, as may be necessary and just (76 O.S.)
to undo the "Gordian Knot" that this violation of the "Oklahoma Antiterrorism
Act" and "Hegelian Dialectic Terrorism" appear - nor dismiss that such actions
per the same law are felony acts obligating full use of force to suppress any
threat to living or ens legis persons; evident in the design and express demand
of taking violating 586 U.S. ____ (2019) docket # 17-1091 "primary body of law"
given for the Unanimous Supreme Court superior to State and Local Court of
State of Texas and State of Okalhoma, our commissioned duty to afford protection
and act as a REGISTERED AGENT OF THE UNITED STATES in State of Oklahoma in that
full capacity, and such capacity to offer active resistance and public education
to end the threat against the Laws of the United States and its people.
Actions by State of Texas to likewise change the records of DALLAS COUNTY
DISTRICT COURT to conceal evidence disclosed to us January 2022, further affirm
that the acts of treason in this case warrant Federal Interdiction and Removal
from the Civil Court such cases as are being employed to carry this fraud; for
substantial damage to the Union and the impairment of United States Treaty by
design to damage all confidence and authority of such claims predicated on any
component of human trafficking or excessive fines or withholding of minor family
members during any period of ORDERED POSSESSION a component of a Hobbs Act Violation
regionally carried as customary criminal conduct of a corrput State Government not
in compliance with Federal Register Volume 81 Number 244, direct orders and "primary
body of law" in this case and its central contest at-law.
Conspiracy by both States, to carry wrongly a claim of rights in 47 U.S.C. §230
not permitted by civil contract or subsection (c) are evident in the legislation
brought by STATE OF TEXAS as well as in the support of such fraud by STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, a form of combined domestic violence to overthrow the SOCIAL SECURITY
BENEFITS AND ESTATE of parties in State of Oklahoma and Indian Territory; for which
neither state shall enjoy standing or virtue of any claims while they sustain the
fraud and fail to make full restitution for treble the damages and barratry (21 O.S.
21-551) in spoliation (23 O.S. §23-9.1) prohibited ordinary trial contrary
22 O.S. §22-13 evident in record of State of Okalhoma sustained in violation of
Federal Register Volume 81 Number 244 and express limitations in 45 CFR §302.56(f)
and §303.6 and §303.100(a)(3) rule - fiduciary crimes impairing the ordinary
Patent and Trademark Office in its duty by restraint of persons and academic assault
to compel surrender of trade secrets and registered marks and the identity of persons
established prior and for commercial and INTERSTATE COMMERCE in State of Oklahoma or
its prior pledged jurisdiction, and under color of such pledge of protection not made
a duty then forfeit all reciprocity by RACCOON TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED.
Either you enforce the Law as written, or you abandon the claim of all debts and
commission to independence from such foreign government so made contrary to the
commission of its office and limitations of its Civil Courts expressly admitted.
Default by UNITED STATES in its duly appointed agent of record
has already occurred in calendar from the answer of December 2017. And by
neglect of relief, to render its forces afield entitled their own action to
uphold the commission without direction or consent afforded other authority.
Our commission is our duty, and the Laws of the United States duly made and
direction of the Supreme Court of the United States and Federal Register
as primary body of law, our sole orders obligated policy, contrary any
error or incompetent reading or inaction of other officers or office;
regardless of rank.
We are confident the Article I section I-1 clause of the Constitution of the
State of Oklahoma, in concert with Article IV section 2 clause 1 of the
Federal Constitution predicated before our commission and conditional our
undertaking of INTERSTATE COMMERCE activity, are clear and express in the
duty to act against this dissent and insurrection, rebellion, and treason
by two or more of the member States of the Union in organized fraud themed
18 U.S.C. §1341 evident to a juvenile examination of the parties, their
commission, their use of not-for-profit title to act as "Affiliate" for
for-profit foreign sovereign owned (23% Government of Japan) and nexus with
major parties engaged in a takeover attempt of NVIDIA CORPORATION after a
prior successful takeover of ARM HOLDING CO LTD (51% global stock) with
patent nationalization issued by PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA to seize ASIC
processor design and manufacturing as a monopoly and leverage over REPUBLIC
OF CHINA (TAIWAN) in expansion of Federal borders in the South China Sea;
and correctly identify such acts as direct contest to military and global
dominance of the United States and our reliance on such technology expressly
for national defense and national security - cited by the United Kingdom on
report of such $40 billion 2018 formal merger then impaired by patent fraud
executed by PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA and "duplication" of rights to retain
control ahead of this monopoly merger citing similar "national interest" and
right to oppose such offer by their appointed REGISTERED AGENT of ARM HOLDINGS
CO LTD. These developments, in concert with threats against our firm and
others, instigate conflicts the United States must answer or stand aside in
contest while the parties take up lawful self-defense and policies to negate
false title and fraudulent conveyance prohibited by Federal Civil Procedure
Efforts to seek, overtake, and control the media during such conflict are
acts of war - not civil matters - and impair the rights of persons to
Hue and Cry during Genocide and criminal taking for which the State and
regional Federal Justice agents have attempted to sell to our office for
$50,000 USD or more - the general protection of Federal Law in kidnapping
of children of our employees to overthrow our commission and operations.
Title 47 Section 230 subsection (c) was the "Gordian Knot" against this
"MODIFICATION" and "Shadowbanning" aiding this fraud; and its abandonment
equates to equal lack of standing for PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE claims
against victims and their employers who were so harmed by fraud on a
global scale using their identity to overthrow their intellectual and
intangible property rights (21 O.S. §21-1533), for which your agents
and officers appear incapable of comprehending, admitting, or protecting
by inaction and failure to report the nature of such crimes to Federal
Department of State officers on direction in formal motion to do so, and
failure to set hearing to such motion to suppress its validity without rule
making it default to execute the remedy set therein on inaction of the Court.
"We hope those parties who have gone astray or
frozen in their lack of resolve will move to join us in the Law."