WHAT DID YOU DO?
Sending someone a message to DIRECT them to open a URL to a site that has a letter of
extortion demanding money over $10,000 USD November 14 2021, created about 2:58 am
per ICANN WHOIS database, is not "SERVICE OF PROCESS". It is a crime per 21 O.S. §21-1304
Oklahoma State Criminal Code.
This demand included a claim for civil debt "as if it were owing and due", despite the
statement that such debt was enjoined a CIVIL COURT CASE filed November 2018, which
prohibits any claim such debt is due or owed while such case is pending before the public,
as such debt is DISPUTED, and on service of civil complaint and CIVIL ANSWER duly filed,
the failure to respond with counter-claim to that CIVIL ANSWER after 30 days or hold trial
in 12 months makes the answer of the defendant deemed LEGAL FACT. This includes any
final judgement claims, paid in full status of the debt, fraud claims
against you, remedy sought, et al.
The case is in default if 22 O.S. §22-13 is not met in the ordinary 12 months of the
first day of filing of the case, and wrongly held over after 12 months from grant of motion
for jury trial; regardless of the nature of the civil contest.
WHAT WAS YOUR RESPONSIBILITY?
To inform the court and the other party of any change of legal address from 2001 to 2022,
and of any change in school of the child and of any medical or psychological care of the
child, any medications given to the child, and of the place to recover the child for the
ORDER OF POSSESSION. Concealing that information from the other party constitutes kidnapping.
WHAT IS NOTICE PER THIS ORDER OR CIVIL PROCESS
Filing such change of address with the court and serving such notice on the other party
by U.S. MAIL or other physical common carrier, is required.
Writing it on some obscure website or forum is not legal notice. Nor posting it in a
newspaper outside the County of Residence and City of Residence of the party, or other
public forum not used generally by the other party, is not.
There is no excuse for this when the other party in the case is a REGISTERED AGENT and
their legal address on file with the Oklahoma Secretary of State for service of process
in that capacity from 1998-2022.
WAS CIVIL PROCESS CARRIED OUT OR AVOIDED
The parties sent threats to the defendant using false names and fasified accounts
made for that purpose, directed to websites created using "REGISTRANT ANONYMITY SERVICES"
paid for to conceal SERVICE OF PROCESS; thus hiding themselves from lawful contest in any
jurisdiction on purpose to menace, threaten, and harass the defendant and his business,
customers, and to intimidate the public during selection of a jury.
The abducting party removed the Child from DALLAS COUNTY into DENTON COUNTY, lied about
the address of the child to conceal the child further, was found not present at the
address alleged to be the child's place of concealment disclosed as the home of IVA
PETERSEN of THE COLONY, TEXAS; and did file in October 2001 in DALLAS COUNTY DISTRICT COURT
alleging a false address in DALLAS COUNTY undisclosed to the parent from whose home the
child was taken for purpose of perpetual conecalment as a hostage and for business advantage.
HAS ANY INDICATION OF CIVIL PROCESS BEEN EVIDENT IN THIS CASE OVER 2001-2022
At no time has the abductor or their associate disclosed as ORDERED to the Oklahoma
Parent the information obligated by a child custody order, and such courts of STATE
OF TEXAS refused to grant protection or enforce this without prior payment of EXCESSIVE
FINES in disregard of real income, loss of income due to public fraud to use the child
to damage the employment of the Oklahoma Parent expressly, and illegal taking barred
by 45 CFR Federal Law and prior by 15 U.S.C. §1673 to suggest false incarceration
if illegal demands were not paid unconditionally.
OBLIGATION OF THE ALIENATED PARENT MET
The Oklahoma Parent has notified the STATE TITLE IV AGENCY of their location at all
times, and such failure to make report and give notice for this to the Court or
other Parent has been met with REFUSAL to provide location and health and welfare
information on the child or provide CROSS EXAMINATION of counter-claims to child
abuse complaints filed; and systematic destruction of such complaints to appear as
no modification request or contest were filed - violating 45 CFR §302.56(f) rule.
STATE LIABILITY FOR FRAUD EVIDENT AND DUE PAYMENT
Pursuant 45 CFR 302.56(f) and 303.100(a)(3), excessive fines have been charged and
refusal of modification illegally sustained in 2002-2022, while the child was
concealed for 20 years without contact or communication pledged by STATE OF TEXAS
a duty not performed or enforced; and such liability for $14.4 Billion USD in
TITLE IV GRANT taken for this service retained, in addition to refusal of trial
and denial of TEXAS FAMILY CODE §157.375 in all contact seeking recovery to
threaten the Okalhoma Parent with false imprisonment for bringing CITATION OF
CONTEMPT to enforce their rights and demanding relief under Criminal Law denied
by a fraud of civil process after a premeditated child abduction and physical
violence against their person and in a concerted pattern against witnesses to
intimidate persons during the case and against appeal.
Per 45 CFR §303.100(a)(8) rule, the State bears the burden of repayment of
such awards in excess of the "discharge" of the debt made per TEXAS FAMILY CODE
§157.261 by operation of law on conversion of remedy to a "final judgment"
and payment to execute the clause set forth in the UNILATERAL CONTRACT portion
of order 01-17702-R, obligating "discharge" done to such civil debt and penalties.
CIVIL PROCESS IS
Actual "CIVIL SERVICE OF PROCESS" is by making mailing of the information without
demands or conditions or threats, as specified in 45 CFR §303.6.
Threats of using criminal justice to compel payment, and omission of the words
required as of February 2017 and later in all correspondence to "the legal
question is limited to the ability to pay" are omitted by STATE OF TEXAS in
all correspondence; making those letters void as TITLE IV ACTS and 21 O.S. §21-1304
"LETTERS THREATENING" not permitted in each contact in this case, and to style the
case as if eligible enforcement for more than $500 USD in any CITATION or to
suggest enforcement for any amount past thirty (30) days of the first day such
funds were entered as "owing and due", illegal.
These rules were created in February 2017 as mandatory, per 45 CFR §302.0 and
§303.0 made MANDATORY under the AUTHORITY of the TITLE IV PROGRAM a condition
to receive the State monies paid in full to STATE OF TEXAS and STATE OF OKLAHOMA.
No other Statutory Law or Custom is permitted, unless such State has filed and
been awarded by the Federal Court a "Federal Exemption Ruling" for Federal Register
Volume 81 Number 244. By refusing to carry this as "primary body of law", each
State has entered into alleged 21 O.S. §21-1341 felony violation to sustain
prior law in this case.
CIVIL PROCESS IS NOT
Reading a website or FACEBOOK profile and attempting to construe that information
as a CIVIL SERVICE OF PROCESS or legally correspondence directed to you.
Where you contact such person using FACEBOOK, EMAIL, TELEPHONE WITHOUT GIVING
YOUR LEGAL NAME AND WITHOUT ILLEGAL DEMANDS OR FRAUD DEMANDS OR CLAIMS, or
any other means excluding U.S. Mail or a Common Mail Carrier of record; and
serve on them abusive claims and demands and fraud to harm their income,
right to work, career, and public reputation which ARE NOT FIRST HAND INFORMATION
PREPARED TO UNDERGO A TEST AT TRIAL OF LEGAL FACT SUCH AS WITNESS OF ACTS AND
FALSE CLAIMS UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY - that is not LEGAL SERVICE OF PROCESS and
is criminal stalking activity in each unwanted contact made with the person or
their account or business or employer.
The party so threatened, especially where such threats are created and published
in a format or by design to be digested by the general public incorporating fraud
and false claims against the party, is entitled to MAKE LEGAL ANSWER IN THE SAME
FORMAT AND MEDIA or other necessary notices also as is required to quash the
fraud and correct any attempt to deceive the public (76 O.S. §76-3, §76-4)
per Oklahoma Law 22 O.S. §22-31 rule.
This "CIVIL RIGHT OF ANSWER" is not a means to excuse the initial false claims or
initial publication of false information or use of the image of a person or persons
without their permission in commercial claims, to damage a business, or to defraut;
and may not be construed as a "justification" to sustain the prior false claims or
immunity for the initial contact to harass, menace, threaten, and cause emotional
and psychological injury to the person and to their ability to earn income upon
which TITLE IV CAUSE is then solely predicated and limited to 65% or less of the
REAL INCOME after taxes and fines, fees, costs, and cost of living of $11,000 USD
per year; so designated "disposable income" at law.
Effort to suggest that payment is due regardless of medical costs or other concerns
or debts - as created in excess of $100,000 USD by VERONICA PETERSEN in theft of a
child and flight to restrain the business owner before AMERICAN EXPRESS CENTURION
BANK and AMERICAN EXPRESS CARD SERVICES in 2001; and theft of cellular phone
equipment belonging to SHADOWDANCERS L.L.C. of Oklahoma then refused return and
refusal to pay for telecommunications usage over $300 USD, in concert with threat
to injure a minor child on contest to such taking and $10,000 additional fraud
paid to TRINITY MEDICAL CENTER of THE COLONY, TEXAS by JAMES ALLEN from Social
Security Savings funds for pledge of residency of the child and siblings made
by VERONICA PETERSEN to permanent location in August 2001 in PONTOTOC COUNTY,
STATE OF OKLAHOMA; then defrauded in this effort - are matters of record that
STATE OF TEXAS and STATE OF OKLAHOMA have knowingly refused to enter into this
case as obligated by 45 CFR §302.56(f) now under Federal Criminal Complaint.
Any effort to coerce a person to change their testimony, either physical or
electronic or by the 20,000 requests per hour sent to our network from
DIGITAL OCEAN LLC and prior from "HETZNER.DE" and in a patter of fraud and
extortion to disrupt business activity in 2017-2022 on TWITCH INTERACTIVE INC.
of California and between State of Oklahoma and State of Texas; documented over
that period in ongoing harassment of a business and prior pattern of 8.1 million
ICMP packets generated by Donald J. Beal to disrupt AT&T Internet Services in
extortion in this cause and loss of use of communication services in STATE OF
NEW JERSEY and STATE OF NEW YORK by SHADOWDANCERS L.L.C., are not "CIVIL SERVICE
OF PROCESS" and constitute a pattern of criminal racketeering to disrupt
CIVIL SERVICE OF PROCESS.".
Theft of mail from U.S. Mail Boxes including letters from OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT
OF HUMAN SERVICES to the beneficiary in December 2021 are now documented and
filed in formal police report with the U.S. Mail Inspector's Letter affirming
tampering with U.S. Mail is a component of this ongoing harassment as of January
2022. Disruption of the REGISTERED AGENT mail address, in concert with such
November 14 2021 action to extort $41,000 USD; is consistent with Racketeering
Activity inverfering in United States Mail Service and interference with the
CIVIL SERVICE OF PROCESS by the court to warrant a Federal Investigation by
the DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA into failure to act int his case by STATE OF OKLAHOMA
and STATE OF TEXAS and regional Federal Justice Offices over 2001-2022 child
concealment for extortion of a United States Corporation by name in recent
explicit written threats, 2013 prior extensive threats, and 2007-2012 extortion
using FACEBOOK and MYSPACE contact to harass and menace and stalk the parent
seeking enforcement of their ORDERED POSSESSION OF A CHILD.
MENTAL ILLNESS OF PERPETRATORS IS EVIDENT
Continued denial of Federal Register as "primary body of law" in concert with
commercial threats to seek "forfeiture" of a commission of business or dispel its
legal right in XXIII-1A "RIGHT TO WORK" access on unregistered union labor activity
by STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF MICHIGAN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, and CANADA members of
labor organizations for ROBERT HALF TECHNOLOGIES, TEK SYSTEMS, NTT AMERICA, and
their related employees and officers of FAIRWAY INDEPENDENT MORTGAGE engaged in
this fraud activity, suggest gross mental health defect or criminal racketeering
of a Federal Degree in the taking for concealment, concealment, abuse, deceit,
and injury to a child to coerce another pre-existing business to surrender its
commission and property, real estate, and inheritance rights through public
fraud reliant in 2002-2004, 2011, 2013, and 2021-2024 abuse of the ICANN REGISTRY
and GOOGLE SEARCH ENGINE to extort, blackmail, and kidnap a child from NATIVE
AMERICAN TERRITORY in a pattern of abuse and upon racially motivated and gender
discrimination remarks of conspicious racial and mental health slurs incorporated
purposefully to damage competition and INTERFERE IN INTERSTATE COMMERCE.
To persist in such activity it is evident that Veronica Marie Petersen,
Donald Beal, Brian Young, and Alicia Scarbrough are deficient in empathy to
a clinical degree with high functioning behavior and claims consistent with
sociopath personality disorder and language use which is incorporated with
clinical narcissistic abuse which one or more of the parties appears to
adhere to as if based in reality despite clear delusion and disregard for
the health, welfare, and safety of a child and other persons; and in concert
with perjury before the court to falsify claims of alternative restoration
or negitiation under color of law and in joint act to kidnap, conceal, and
to deceive the child while holding them against the ORDER OF POSSESSION
made in pledge to the biological father for consideration of money or payment
and in effort to impose subbordination upon the person in peonage not a
lawful component of any civil procedure - themed a 4th and 14th AMENDMENT
violation as cited in abuse by State Agencies and false powers not granted
to the Civil State and Federal Courts cited by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg
in 586 U.S. ____ (2019) case no 17-1091 pronouncement of judgment for the
Unanimous Supreme Court of the United States, declaring then this activity
UNCONSTITUTIONAL and void in the making.
Persons acting contrary law are themed competent if they correct their
behavior in a timely and immediate fashion.
Persons presented with the primary body of law and AUTHORITY OF THE UNITED
STATES in written order, and persist, are engaged in sedition and other
criminal activity which only a mental illness defense may excuse in limited
and formal making; and where such defense has not been rendered the victim
may presume lawfully that such acts are crimes of a premendiated nature and
false testimony and false records so created deliberately to constitute
a violation of 23 O.S. §23-9.1 in the third degree, affording "unlimited
damages" per the Oklahoma Supreme Court, as evidence of mens rea.
The victim of such ongoing abuse may cite the behavior, nature, and degree of
claims per Federal Civil Procedure Rule 9, to support a legal assumption of
non compos mentis in the parties as presumption to take precaution and limit
contact without public record and witness to such correspondence; citing threat
of bodily harm and severe mutilation employed to coerce their cooperation,
fraud to seek false incarceration, and threats of such false incarceration to
project such mental health defect upon the victim in a premeditated criminal
scheme by Donald J. Beal, Veronica M. Petersen, Brian Young, Alicia Scarbrough,
and sustained and supported by all of their known commercial associates and as
a component of unregistered businesses, aliases, and "myluv187" account used
to promote their fraud itself a threat of "California Code of Murder" (187) in
gang activity of an Interstate Nature, which obligates Federal Interdiction and
removal of this case from State Courts unable to carry the FEDERAL PUBLIC POLICY
due to complicity or negligence; and failure to enter default to the record on
numerous trials in sustained alleged crimina 18 U.S.C. §1341 violation
which the regional FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION has declined to apply against
the States abuse even after Federal Register Volume 81 Number 244 (Dec 16 2016)
made such conduct wholly illegal; and to falsely style such ongoing activity
as civil in nature to conserve Federal Agent resources contrary a fixed financial
interest of earnings of the UNITED STATES, which is wholly unlawful and
central to the stated plan of action by the abductors and State agents acting
to kidnap the child - placing in such contest "$0" book value on the child and
parental rights injured to obtain such extortion payments in fraud.
No competent court would agree, and 23 O.S. 23-9.1 "unlimited jury damages"
are designed to penalize States whose revenue of $170 billion USD (STATE OF TEXAS)
and grants of $1.5 billion (OKLAHOMA) per year in each case; make ordinary penalties
and fines meaningless to deter State employee fraud of this level and degree.
Fines must be proportionate to the 65-100% taking executed over 2001-2021, and
false civil suit in violation of 45 CFR §303.6 limit of $500 maximum fine
sought by CITATION for enforcement.
Refunds of amounts not permitted trial to determine, as obligated a UIFSA
case duly filed and indictment made; prohibit this case from escape of refund
of 100% of such civil order fine and additional $8 million loss of income sought
without contest in 2018 case FR-18-04; and immunity sought against repeated abuse
to prohibit this conduct in the region against persons born in INDIAN TERRITORY
who were prior already subjected to a child removal without legal cause and
concealment to destroy all parental rights in prior 1975-2021 July fraud.
That kidnapping of Native persons and abuse based on "ethnic racial characteristics"
is being sustained in this way for failure to change State Law expressly contracted
a duty in FEDERAL REGISTER VOLUME 81 NUMBER 244 for fees exceeding $2.2 billion
USD per year from 2017-2022, is evidence of a larger 18 U.S.C. §666 embezzlement
refused lawful examination by the FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION for 20 years; and
complete collapse of the securities system of the UNITED STATES falsely predicated
on the cestui qui trust system themed the SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and legal
persons made for assignment of benefits in the SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER registry.
Such system (SSN) is the sole property of the CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES per
Flemming v Nestor (1960), and a book asset subject liability and surrender in civil
counter-suit and for portion subject legal operation of a motion for "ALLOD" duly
made by JAMES ARNOLD ALLEN in 2018 case FR-18-04 to remove those legal persons from
FEDERAL JURISDICTION citing the failure of State Jurisdiction to carry State Law
and Federal Law set forth in FEDERAL REGISTER VOLUME 81 NUMBER 244, a FEDERAL
CONTRACT entered into on behalf of the People and living persons of the Americas,
for whom such individuals are the cestui qui (beneficiaries), not property or
collateral for other debts of the UNITED STATES, nor their labor or franchise or
children property for such debts contrary evidence and positions of case 01-17702-R
and FR-18-04 falsely themed UNITED STATES LAW by STATE OF TEXAS and STATE OF OKALHOMA
contrary contract of December 2016 "FEDERAL REGISTER VOLUME 81 NUMBER 244".
The ongoing belief in "debt bondage" and "asset forfeiture" for civil fines is
prohibited by the Public Policy of the United States per case 17-1091 "Timbs v Indiana"
and not a power of the State or Federal Civil Court per direct instruction of the 9-0
ruling; and persons sustaining such claims are either in seditious rebellion or
mentally incompetent to hold public office of the public trust; or both.
BURDEN OF PROOF IS ON THE STATE PER 45 CFR §302.56(f) et al
Pursuant FEDERAL REGISTER, the primary body of law of the United States and sole
authority in such case or disptue, Volume 81 Number 244 (Dec 2016) effective over
State Statutory Law to make void any contest or claim contrary in-consideration
fully paid of $7.5 billion USD in Federal Funds or more;
The sole duty to show proof beyond the written notice of legal cause is upon
the State of Oklahoma TITLE IV AGENT.
45 CFR §302.56(f) oblgiates the STATE OF TEXAS TITLE IV AGENCY and STATE OF
OKALHOMA TITLE IV AGENCY to place such complaint in the file and to give anser
to such complaint as if served on them by a licensed attorney when produced by
the obligator and in all details a duty to answer the same as if dealing with
any licensed attorney. (Fed Reg Vol 81 No 244)
Any effort to suggest further burden of proof remains upon the obligator
is contrary "Affirmati Non Neganti Incumbit Probatio" - meaning that the
burden of proof is upon the TITLE IV AGENCY as the party asserting a right
to collection, not upon the obligator who denies the claim in 45 CFR §302.56(f),
and this is expressly clarified in Federal Register Volume 81 Number 244 as the
Public Policy of the United STates and mandatory duty to execute as written and
stated by the State in their performance of duty per 45 CFR §302.0 and §303.0
to receive Federal Funds in this cause and grant whatsoever in any amount.
The opt-out process is clear; and discovery obligates that the TITLE IV AGENCY
produce such "Federal Exemption Ruling" to the Obligator in 30 days of contest
or abandon the claim not evident sole rule of Federal Register Volume 81 Number 244.
Where obstruction of this duty of CIVIL PROCEDURE set forth in writing is made to
extend or make permanent the loss of POSSESSION RIGHTS to a child, and to deny
communication where medical report suggest the child is demanding to speak to
the parent denied access without legal cause and contrary a court ORDER or
Inherent Rights of the parent (76 O.S. §76-8), the malicious abuse of
public office affords class three violation awards of 23 O.S. §23-9.1
and 21 O.S. §21-748.2 civil counter-suit with unlimited damages for
"debt bondage" and "forced labor" to satisfy such demands conditional suspension
of ordinary and lawful obligated rights pledged to a person a crime of kidnapping
not afforded civil court powers to impose or suspend on no conviction of a crime
(21 O.S. § 21-891, never indicted or charge brough against the parent);
and component to a Federal fraud (18 U.S.C. §1341).
Federal Kidnapping Charges should apply, and exemption to protect any party in
such premeditated action are evidence of serious mental illness paired with
abuse of public office to construct a large-scale fraud sustained by criminal
acts set forth in 43A O.S. 43A-5-104 State of Oklahoma Statutory Law.