Hegelian Issues Index

"Onus probandi incumbit ei qui dicit, non ei qui negat."

- the burden of proof is on the person who makes the claim, not on the person who denies (or questions the claim).

• ...more Law and Latin goodies
• Stimson Doctrine
• UIFSA Rev 2008 (2015 with commentary)
  for example:
  

  Per section 314, Party A cannot sue party B after party B sued party A in 2015 March 11 prior end of suit; which they did in November 2018 impairing such suit, to again default.

  Party A cannot transfer the case in 2015 and become Party B for defense in a claim obligated 'Onus probrandi incumit ei qui decit, non ei qui negat' (in the original suit), and such suit must have cause in claim a civil cause of action clearly stated and shown in original suit, or be a nonsuit for failure to prove that claim ('abandonment'), not merely some other legal question that is not the material cause of a civil fine; and any change of civil cause of action mid-suit is a sixth amendment violation and prima facie evidence of fraud, as we see in 2002-2022 fraud cited. Where party A in the original suit threatened to sue party B in violation of their rights to coerce them to drop enforcement of a contract they are entitled to, that violates section 314 and negates the contract as a false order not entitled UIFSA standing or suit. To then act on such threat in 2018-2022 without 'Fast and Speedy Trial' (22 O.S. § 22-13) is a violation of State, Federal, and Interstate contract between United States and each State involved, separately, for full damages themed on the title 23 grant fraud and failure to convey property, of $2.2 billion USD per year, a contract between the States and United States in which the victim is a disclosed party and entitled relief citing grant embezzlement described in Title 18 §666 as criminal conduct, and so prohibited in 15 U.S.C. §1692d also.